Don’t monopolistic operators damage the competitive advantages of a country?
Here is a thought. I am a frequent visitor to a country which has an operator who is in a strong, monopolistic situation.
Every time I visit this place, I think that the operator is doing a dis-service to the nation’s entrepreneurs.
In effect, the operator benefits on a short term basis from high prices and walled gardens.
The country's government is blinded by short term stability in the marketplace.
Meanwhile the mobile entrepreneurs suffer (or emigrate to neighbouring countries with far more enlightened governments).
Very soon I expect that other more open technologies like wimax will come along.
The operator's profitability will drop and they will probably be acquired because like all old operators they have a high cost base
However the real loser is the country - because I suspect that its best mobile entrepreneurs and will leave for foreign lands and that's a permanent loss to the economy!
Original Source: Open Gardens
